I tweeted earlier tonight that I desperately want to write, but I don’t have anything to write about.
So, I made a cup of half-caff coffee, opened this blog post, and started writing about nothing in particular.
I deleted half of it. I changed the topic no fewer than five times. I rambled for about 1000 words and decided to cut it down.
And here we are.
This is pretty raw. Just a warning.
I have said this to some in the past, and I mean it more than ever: if my job did not require me to be knowledgeable about social media, I would be off of it entirely. Or, at the very least, I would have an anonymous Twitter account to follow the various sports, video game, and humor accounts I like to follow.
I must confess that I am becoming more discouraged with the ways evangelicals use Twitter every single day I am on the platform.
I’m focusing on Twitter specifically because it is hard to find the global, trans-cultural communication you find on Twitter on any other social media platform. Facebook has engineered itself to encourage conversations around content with friends. Instagram is for talking about whatever pictures people have posted. Twitter is where normal people, famous people, and everyone in between come to talk, complain, and argue (and mostly the last two).
The Twitter conduct I have seen lately, among evangelicals specifically because that’s most of who I am watching on Twitter, has been discouraging.
I’m not the only one, and to be fair, people are feeling this way outside of the evangelical sub-culture.
I’m not saying I’m exempt. I know that I have contributed to the negativity of evangelical Twitter in my time on the platform. Without a doubt.
Lately, I post very little beyond links to what I’m writing or random thoughts that come to my head.
You know what most of evangelical Twitter has become, at least from my little perch?
A place for all the cool, “woke” people to dunk on the “ignorant” people.
“Please shower me with likes as I quote-tweet and shame this ignorant person who replied to my very woke tweet.”
Much, if not most, of the time, I am 100% in agreement with whatever it is the cool, woke person said and am simultaneously disgusted with the way in which he or she shamed the other person.
What I’m seeing on Twitter from many of my evangelical brothers and sisters is straight-up bullying.
A bully is “a person who uses strength or power to harm or intimidate those who are weaker.”
Twitter has become a place for evangelicals to bully other people—often other evangelicals.
Right now, you’re probably thinking either, “Bro where you been? It’s been like this for years!” or you’re thinking, “Well he’s clearly not on our side.”
No one has dunked on me (yet). No one has subtweeted me to my knowledge. I know this practice isn’t new.
It just seems to me that it has become more culturally acceptable for evangelicals to bully other people on Twitter.
Why? I think the answer is simple: hatred of President Donald Trump.
Woke evangelicals don’t like President Trump. And, whether they agree with it or not, whether they notice it or not, they believe his actions give them license to treat others on Twitter and other social media platforms with disrespect in order to communicate the misalignment of his agendas with the gospel.
The cool, woke evangelicals who bully others on Twitter through their choir-preaching quote-tweets or their slick subtweets believe that, in order to adequately communicate that the President’s policies do not align with the gospel, they have been given permission to dunk on others on Twitter.
I think this is wrong, and I’ve been silently watching it unfold for so long I finally decided to write about it.
What’s worse is that the vast majority of Americans (and thereby, evangelicals) are not on Twitter. So, the cool-kid, woke evangelicals express their frustrations into the Twittersphere to the tune of retweets and likes with little pushback because the average evangelical without a seminary degree who disagrees with them isn’t on Twitter, or at least isn’t verified.
And after the ways many average evangelicals have been treated when expressing dissent toward a cool, woke evangelical on Twitter, I can’t imagine many want to engage any more even if they have sincere disagreements.
God is not glorified when you dunk on someone who disagrees with you on Twitter.
Subtweets are passive aggressive and affirm the worst gossip-related stereotypes about the church.
Your shaming of someone on Twitter isn’t like Christ flipping the tables in the temple.
It’s like the pharisee who thanks God he isn’t like those other people.
“The Pharisee was standing and praying like this about himself: ‘God, I thank you that I’m not like other people—greedy, unrighteous, adulterers, or even like this tax collector.'” (Luke 18:11)